Source: Fox News · 2026-09-16 · Original article ↗

Alito, Thomas shred 'Hail Mary' challenge to federal ballot mail rules in dissent

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

The unsigned order left the injunction up. Alito called the challenge a Hail Mary that rarely succeeds.

Summary

  • Fox News reports the Supreme Court on Monday denied the Trump administration's request to stay a universal injunction blocking a final USPS rule on election ballot mail. The order was unsigned. Justices Samuel Alito and Clarence Thomas dissented.
  • Alito wrote that some plaintiffs lack standing and the rest are pursuing a claim the Court has recently called a Hail Mary pass that rarely succeeds. He said the government made the showings needed for a stay.
  • Justice Brett Kavanaugh concurred that, on the interim briefing, there is at least a fair prospect the rule falls within the Postal Service's statutory authority, but said applying it in the 2026 elections would be arbitrary and capricious because officials lack time to implement it before Election Day.
  • The rule would require federal ballot mail in logo-marked, high-speed-scannable envelopes with a unique voter barcode, plus envelope-design review and a voter-data upload to a USPS portal. Noncompliant mailings would be returned to election officials to correct.

Commentary

A shop dad still walks a stamped envelope to a blue box and knows a barcode is supposed to mean the ballot can be traced. He did not pay the levy so a universal injunction could keep the next midterm on the honor system.

Unsigned denial. Alito and Thomas in dissent. Kavanaugh saying the authority is there and the calendar is the excuse. The honest household already paid the clerk. The linoleum at the post office still waits.

Look every working father who still treats a mail ballot like a deed in the eye and answer this: if the Court can call the challenge a Hail Mary and still leave the injunction up, who still owns the next envelope that never got a unique mark?

Comments

If the challenge is a Hail Mary, why does the injunction still own the midterm envelope?
u/border_dad · 5h

Unsigned order. Alito dissent. Unique barcode. Keep that order.

u/midwest_vet · 4h

I stood a line so a ballot still meant a mark you can scan. A returned envelope is not voter suppression.

u/rule_first · 4h

Alito. Thomas. Kavanaugh calendar. USPS portal. Print the four.

u/tokyo_ally · 3h

Allied posts still treat a unique mark as chain of custody, not a mood.

u/docket_rat · 3h

Standing problems. Hail Mary claim. Universal injunction. File the three.

u/night_shift · 2h

I still drop a bill after a graveyard. I want the next ballot as traceable as that bill.

u/texas_mom · 90m

A midterm on the honor system is not flexibility. It is a warning the street already paid.

u/gulf_watch · 55m

A blocked barcode rule is a second border around a mailbox.

u/press_clip · 30m

Fox printed the dissent, the barcode, and Kavanaugh's clock. Argue those nouns.

u/soc_lead · 15m

Scan the envelope. Upload the roll. A mail ballot is not a rumor.

Paraphrased comments. Not attributed.

More from this rōnin

Stories → Discoveries → Books → Buy me a coffee →
A Samurai Loose in Modern America Volume Two cover
New release: Volume Two — 100 stories
A Samurai Loose in Modern America — Volume Two. One hundred later field reports.
See on Amazon → NEW
NOBUNAGA samurai icon
🍶 Freshly printed and standing at attention.
Paperback and Kindle, both out now. All my books in one honorable place.
To the bookstore, swiftly →
NOBUNAGA icon
He fends off bullets for free, but a coffee he cannot refuse.
Your cup keeps this wandering project alive. Thank you, honored friend.
☕ Buy this samurai a coffee