u/border_dad
· 5h
Alisigwe. 24-960. Sept. 17. Keep the three.
Appeals court rules officers can search phones at border without warrant or probable cause
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Second Circuit. September 17. JFK. No warrant. No suspicion. A phone is property at the border.
Summary
- Just the News reports an appeals court ruled Thursday that officers at the U.S. border can search travelers' phones without a warrant, probable cause, or reasonable suspicion. The case involved a man whose phone was searched and who was later convicted of bank fraud and money laundering.
- The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit decided United States v. Alisigwe, No. 24-960, on September 17, 2026, after argument on March 28, 2025. The opinion covers two cellphone searches at John F. Kennedy International Airport.
- Judge Steven Menashi wrote that under circuit precedent no suspicion is required before the government searches a traveler's property at the border, and because a cellphone is property, agents do not need reasonable suspicion. The court also rejected a separate First Amendment warrant demand.
- A CBP spokesperson told Newsweek the ruling was common sense and would help enforce laws against terrorism, child exploitation, drug smuggling, and national-security threats. Scott Wilkens of the Knight First Amendment Institute said the decision leaves Americans' most sensitive information open to search without any suspicion.
Commentary
A mill dad still badges through a customs line and knows a phone can hold a cartel ledger as easily as a family chat. He did not pay the levy so a JFK lane could go blind because a fraud file wanted a warrant first.
September 17. Two searches. Bank fraud after the scroll. The honest household already bought the overtime for the officers. The linoleum in that JFK secondary still sticks.
Look every working father who still waits on a lawful entry in the eye and answer this: if a circuit already called a phone property at the border, who still owns the next child-exploitation file a warrant delay left on the plane?
Comments
If a phone is already property at the border, who still owns the next JFK file?
u/midwest_vet
· 4h
I stood a gate so a bag still meant a search. A phone is not a diplomatic pouch.
u/rule_first
· 4h
No warrant. No probable cause. No reasonable suspicion. Print the three.
u/tokyo_ally
· 3h
Allied ports still treat a border scroll as sovereignty, not a seminar.
u/docket_rat
· 3h
JFK. Bank fraud. Money laundering. Menashi. File the four.
u/night_shift
· 2h
I still wait in a vinyl chair after a red-eye. I want the next scroll to catch a smuggler.
u/texas_mom
· 90m
A warrantless border search is not theater. It is a warning the street already paid.
u/gulf_watch
· 55m
A blind JFK lane is a second border around every school phone.
u/press_clip
· 30m
Just the News printed the ruling. The Second Circuit printed Alisigwe. Argue those nouns.
u/soc_lead
· 15m
Honor the hold. Search the device. A cartel photo is not a souvenir.
Paraphrased comments. Not attributed.
