Hospitals, doctors got rich through shady gender-care billing tactics and taking advantage of kids
Image credit: New York Post · tap image for original
A report says hospitals got rich on shady gender-care billing, including kids.
Summary
- The New York Post reports hospitals and doctors used shady billing tactics on gender-care cases.
- The reporting says the schemes took advantage of children as well as payers.
- Codes, modifiers, and repeat procedures are how a clinic turns an ideology into a revenue line.
- Insurers and Medicaid have been paying for treatments that European systems have already restricted.
- The piece lands beside a wider federal look at pediatric transition medicine.
Commentary
When a hospital's growth story is a child's sterility, you are not looking at care. You are looking at a billing machine.
European reviews pulled back. US systems kept coding. That is not compassion. That is a market.
Prosecutors should follow the codes the way they follow opioid mills. Kids are not a specialty product.
Discussion
Was pediatric gender care a medical craze or a billing craze?
claims_desk
If the code is creative and the patient is 14, start with fraud, not feelings.
midwest_vet
I have seen defense contractors pad invoices. This is the same reflex with worse victims.
campus_take
This is a smear on lifesaving care.
rule_first
Lifesaving care does not need shady modifiers. The Post is writing about the modifiers.
tokyo_ally
Japan did not build a pediatric transition industry. That was a choice.
aid_fan
More counseling grants would have prevented the backlash.
docket_rat
Grants funded the pipeline. Follow the NGO money the same way you follow USAID waste.
border_dad
Protecting kids is not optional. Neither is honest billing.
press_clip
Read the codes. If they stacked claims, that is a case file, not a culture war.
night_shift
Pull the charts, pull the EOBs, and name the systems.
Inspired by public posts on X — paraphrased, not attributed.
