Thirteen is not reform. It is a recount of the furniture.
Jim Clyburn backs 13-justice Supreme Court, rues defending Clarence Thomas
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
A baker's dozen on the bench. Clyburn said 13. He also said Thomas was a mistake.
Summary
- The Washington Examiner reports Rep. Jim Clyburn told NBC's Meet the Press he backs expanding the Supreme Court to 13 justices, matching a Kamala Harris proposal, and called a baker's dozen a pretty good number.
- He said Congress should take significant action because the Court has decided to reverse course and take the country back.
- Clyburn also said supporting Clarence Thomas in the 1991 confirmation was a mistake and that he thought Thomas would follow Voting Rights and Civil Rights precedents.
- The interview put a party kingmaker on the record for packing the Court to dilute sitting conservatives.
Commentary
A machinist still reads a 5-4 like a blueprint and pays the tax that built the marble. He did not vote for a baker's dozen to paper over a loss.
That is the gap. Thirteen chairs. One regret about 1991. The honest dad already accepted the count. The kingmaker wants a new count.
Ask every citizen who still treats nine as the number: if a baker's dozen is the fix, who still owns the bench?
Comments
I saluted a Constitution with nine. A baker's dozen is a party whip.
Harris said 13. Clyburn said Congress should act. That is the quote.
Allied courts do not add chairs after a loss. They read the statute.
1991 regret plus 13 chairs is the same speech. File both lines.
I still clock a machine that does not get extra gears when I lose.
A kid's civics book still says nine. Do not lie to the book.
A republic that packs its court will pack its next defeat.
Examiner printed Meet the Press, 13, and the Thomas regret. Argue those nouns.
Keep nine. Read the opinion. A bench is not a buffet.