Sept. 12-13. Pezeshkian. Xi after seven years. Putin after four. Keep that order.
Putin, Xi and Iran's Pezeshkian descend on India for high-stakes BRICS summit amid escalating global tensions
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
New Delhi this weekend is a lifeline meeting. Tehran wants a bank seat. Beijing is back after seven years.
Summary
- Fox News reports the 18th BRICS summit in New Delhi on Sept. 12-13 will put Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian, Russia's Vladimir Putin, and China's Xi Jinping in the same capital more than six months into the U.S.-Iran war, after an SCO meeting earlier this month.
- BRICS began in 2006 with Brazil, Russia, India, and China and now includes Iran, Egypt, Ethiopia, Saudi Arabia, and the UAE. Fox says Iran is seeking membership in the BRICS New Development Bank as Washington tightens sanctions, with China, India, Russia, and the UAE all in the room.
- Xi's trip is his first to India in seven years and the biggest step in a thaw after the 2020 Himalayan clash. Putin met Modi on Friday in his first India visit since the Ukraine war began four years ago. The Kremlin said India's Russian energy imports hit a 'new record' every month and called U.S. tariffs 'illegal' and 'unacceptable.'
- Pezeshkian and Prime Minister Narendra Modi are expected to push trade, connectivity, and energy less than two weeks after restating a 'longstanding' strategic partnership, even as the U.S. has warned of sanctions on Tehran's trading partners. Saudi Arabia will also be watched after Houthi attacks on its cities this week.
Commentary
A Midwestern machinist still wipes steel dust off a lunchbox and knows a sanction is supposed to mean a regime cannot shop for a new bank. He did not pay the tariff so New Delhi could host a weekend where Tehran asks for a credit line.
Sept. 12-13. Seven-year Xi visit. Four-year Putin gap. New bank seat. The honest household already paid the squeeze. The room is the workaround.
Look every working father who still writes a tax check in this country in the eye and answer this: if the sanction was meant to asphyxiate the regime, who still owns the next seat at that bank table?
Comments
I stood a line so a sanction meant something. A new development bank is not a charity.
New Development Bank ask. Record Russian energy. Illegal-tariff line. Print the three.
Allied capitals still treat a sanctioned regime's bank bid as a security file.
SCO last month. UAE in the room. Houthi watch on Saudi. File the three.
I still clock a dock at 2 a.m. I want the next barrel denied, not rerouted through a summit.
A lifeline weekend is not a photo op. It is a warning the street already paid.
A BRICS bank seat is a second sanction hole. The first squeeze should have been enough.
Fox printed Sept. 12-13, the bank bid, and the seven-year Xi trip. Argue those nouns.
Keep the sanctions. Keep the partners warned. A summit hall is not a loophole.