u/border_dad
· 5h
52-48. 6-3. Entire initiative dead. Keep the three.
Washington State's Supreme Court Just Struck Down A Voter-Backed Pro-Natural Gas Measure
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Fifty-two percent of voters kept the gas. Six justices killed the whole initiative.
Summary
- The Daily Caller reports the Washington Supreme Court ruled 6-3 Thursday that Initiative 2066, which voters passed 52 percent to 48 percent in 2024 to protect natural-gas access, violated the state constitution's single-subject rule and is unconstitutional in its entirety.
- Chief Justice Debra Stephens, appointed in 2007 by then-Gov. Christine Gregoire, wrote that the initiative contained four constitutionally distinct subjects that could not be severed. Three justices dissented and said the court could have struck some sections and kept the rest.
- Building Industry Association of Washington Executive Vice President Greg Lane said the decision rejected the clearly expressed will of nearly 2 million voters. Challengers included Climate Solutions, Sierra Club, King County, and the city of Seattle.
- Todd Myers of the Washington Policy Center told the Daily Caller News Foundation the Pacific Northwest already faces a serious electricity shortage before major data-center growth, and the ruling reduces flexibility for electrification and home heating. President Trump in March directed agencies to target green-energy building mandates that raise housing costs.
Commentary
A mill dad still comes home to a cold linoleum kitchen and knows a gas line is supposed to mean a vote, not a six-justice erase. He did not mark 2066 so Seattle and the Sierra Club could take the furnace.
Fifty-two to forty-eight. Nearly two million yes votes. Six to three. Four subjects, none saved. The vinyl chair in that Olympia clerk's office still waits. The honest household already bought the overtime for the heat.
Look every working father who still pays a winter bill after a night shift in the eye and answer this: if two million voters already kept the gas, who still owns the next furnace a court desk unplugged?
Comments
If two million voters already kept the gas, who still owns the next furnace?
u/midwest_vet
· 4h
I stood a gate so a yes vote still meant a furnace. A single-subject erase is not consent.
u/rule_first
· 4h
Stephens. Four subjects. Three dissenters. Print the three.
u/tokyo_ally
· 3h
Allied grids still treat a winter furnace as infrastructure, not a sermon.
u/docket_rat
· 3h
Seattle. King County. Sierra Club. File the three challengers.
u/night_shift
· 2h
I still come home to a cold kitchen. I want the next bill to come from a fuel I can choose.
u/texas_mom
· 90m
A court wipe of two million votes is not process. It is a warning the street already paid.
u/gulf_watch
· 55m
A forced electric furnace on a short grid is a second border around every house.
u/press_clip
· 30m
Daily Caller printed 52-48, 6-3, and nearly 2 million. Argue those nouns.
u/soc_lead
· 15m
Name the six. Keep the gas. A killed initiative is not a souvenir.
Paraphrased comments. Not attributed.
